How many damn times is the fact that the auditing firm, Malone Bailey, botched this audit TWICE going to continue to be ignored? And why is that fact we now know continually being ignored?
We were flat out given the reasons for the 15 month delayed audit.
Malone Bailey incorrectly decides a few months into the audit last spring that they need to change the scope of the audit bc of the “type” of merger.
They continue on with the audit for months again, and when ENZC management is fed up with the delays, they bring in an outside consulting firm. This firm determines that Malone Bailey was incorrect in changing the scope of the audit. Now the audit has to proceed a third time, back under the original scope they began with the prior spring.
This was all clarified recently, so to continue to paint this as some type of problem on ENZC’s behalf for a 15 month ongoing audit is complete bullshit. Let’s all get the facts straight for once and point the blame where it belongs, with Malone Bailey. Anything stated otherwise is completely false.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
