Replies to post #90409 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[rambus]

thanks Mark... eom

[littleBitmoore1]

thanks for the update, mark.

A couple of posts this morning by SFreed give hope as well for drilling in 2007!!

Appreciate your time and effort.

lbm1

[NY__Minute]

Thanks Mark..You have a typo. On your second "highly unprofessional" you left out the "un" in unprofessional. Thanks Again! You truly are a great asset to this board and I greatly appreciated all your efforts and the costs that you incur. Hope You Have A Great Day!!!

[Lickety Split]

Thanks Mark for the update.

Strass

[Art2004]

Thanks Mark, appreciate the update. Good to know that Chevron was in the hunt for a part of Block 2.

[bobwill9]

Thanks Mark for the update

[angryasian]

"I was told drilling should still happen in 2007" What do you mean it "should"?????. YOUR SOURCE SAID 100%!!!! I know this is obnoxious, but this goes to prove that no one source can be 100% right. Time lines change and so do sources. When you think you have a great source, it could be time to find more. Hense, the lady who swore on her kids...that was not me that said it was definite, she said it, and I relayed the message. SHE WAS WRONG...So i went and sought out another source instead of relying on other posters or even ERHE themselves. I was entitled to change my tune..I was PRO buy-in before. but new source says NO WAY. I am not a trader with this stock and do intend to sell off quite a bit when we hit the 1.50 range. I think that will happen in 08. GLTA.


Not so ANGRY anymore

[markgovols]

lol. yes, the second one should be "highly UNprofessional". Thanks for pointing that out.

[wzebra33]

Good work mark,thanks for the great update.

[condor1]

It would seem that the term "highly unprofessional" is not the word that CVX would apply to the efforts.More accurately,the term to apply is "secretive".CVX either knows or strongly believe they know what is down there.Common sense suggests that CVX is attempting to extend it's reach by be secretive and playing dumb/willful ignorance and unprofessionalism.

the term "highly unprofessional" is a professional and respectful phrase.CVX can easily live with that terminology and not lose a wink of sleep.

I would expect that all the other operators and the JDA know exactly what CVX is doing ...or more appropriately,not doing.

CVX is deliberately being uncooperative and not divulging the entirety of the findings from OBO1

[rheddle]

Hi Mark - In your opinion from having spoken with your source, is it that it is still a question of equipment, or might I read from the "highly unprofessional" comment regarding Chevron, that we are seeing a bit of funny business to try and get more of the pie at the expense of cracking on with the job?

Thank-you.