Your post points out that there is no intervention by UOIP in CBV's case. "WE" shareholders are UOIP. Carter is being sued in California for overstepping his bounds and making POOR decisions on behalf of shareholders without proper board approval, and you have been telling shareholders for MONTHS now that there's no point in shareholders taking legal action until Carter, Leane and CBV have divvied up the proceeds of the settlement. So, who, in your opinion, should file on behalf of UOIP?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
