Replies to post #29258 on Mountainstar Gold Inc (fka MSX)

[JRLopehandia]

199% wrong Madam or Sir. "V" signed off Tesoros concessions to me 2007.

With it AMARILLOS SUR and NORTE by UTM, with all valid mineral rights at hand. So acknowledged by Mines and Real State Curator 2011 when granting title solely in my name, against ABX and SLW Pascua Lama Silver Ponzi 2009-2022.

Regardless of the fact that the psychopath exempted from BC the looters of ABX for the USA 2007 shortly after C 29.407-2016 defeat (March 2017) from BC, when in fact they sustained against MSX that local regulators HAD NOTHING to do with ABX, the psychopath that charged MSX permitted and exempted ABX from BC, a crime v. MSX, 2017.

Recently the local criminal regulators exempted WPM TSX for USA NI43102 ??

These criminals are caught pants down Silver and title less. Stay tuned for the "pulling of the plug" a.k.a. the demise of the local and Toronto financial markets psychopath who invented the NI43101 of Pascua Lama to swindle the Canadian markets with Barrick and Silver Wheaton insiders.

Show the purported buy and sale by "V". It, has been impounded by Trial C 3784-2016 at the 18th Civil Court where Barrick "invested USD 1.05 in Chile" as total Pascua Project foreign investment, the rest belongs to SAN JOSE INC CAYMAN ISLANDS - Barrick owns for TSX-OSC 0.000001% only.

Such is the sack of crapola sold by both exchanges in Canada v. MWR and MSX to date ... your WPM ex SLW, is the CRIMINAL ALIBI of ownership for ABX and local regulators v. MWR and MSX. The gig is up. YOU LOSE !

The CONTRACT. Is null and void for in accordance to Alessandri, it lacks a just price, it forces anti constitutional orders against the counterpart, it was written and done UNILATERALLY by ABX Chile. Which renders by the sole ministry of the law, the entire contract null and void.

Furthermore, It was acknowledged by "V" at C 1912-2001 Trial that he never negotiated with Barrick the price. That was my job on record before Barrick knew of "V" or "V" knew that I completed bysiness with Barrick 1996 in Santiago de Chile, protected under legal jurisprudence LAC v. CORONA in Canada and worldwide.