InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

skitahoe

03/15/22 5:01 PM

#451654 RE: iwasadiver #451634

Diver,

I believe you're right on the money about what they will, or won't tell us. I also believe that we can see that they can only go so far without raising substantial funds. While it might be possible for them to raise the needed funds to go all the way to approval, I suspect the terms would be getting really nasty, and so would investors sentiment.

I believe they'll want to raise funds by roughly the latest time they can schedule the Annual Meeting for in June. I think they'll want additional shares authorized at the meeting, and to assure that happening investors will need to be better informed by that time. The least I would expect would be the TLD statement at the time the proxy was issued for the meeting, that would probably be a month before the Annual Meeting.

If this makes sense, I believe it's saying that we should see TLD no later than May, it could come with the Journal, or perhaps the Abstract for a presentation at ASCO, which could be followed with the Journal immediately after ASCO. My point is that by May we should be much better informed, hopefully it will be sooner than that, but financially they'll need to do it by the time they're asking us to vote to provide additional funding. It also make far more sense to issue new stock when the share price is dramatically higher, which can only happen when investors know far more about what they have.

Gary
icon url

hankmanhub

03/15/22 5:02 PM

#451655 RE: iwasadiver #451634

As much as everyone wants to know “when” they’re not going to tell us.


I never asked for "when."

2. They’re working to build a consensus, writing their BLAs/MAAs, expanding FlaskWorks so it’s ready before the fall and perfect timing for approvals, in the Peer Review process as we speak with the journal I think it will land in. This last particular part is key because if we’re there then it’s going to be fairly soon



I hope so too, BUT I want to hear this from them - not you. I appreciate your thoughts, but it would be far more reassuring coming from them (unless you are secretly on the board).
icon url

flipper44

03/15/22 5:27 PM

#451665 RE: iwasadiver #451634

Smells like DI is giving out material info over the phone? Or are you making this up?

“They’re working to build a consensus, writing their BLAs/MAAs, expanding FlaskWorks so it’s ready before the fall and perfect timing for approvals, in the Peer Review process as we speak with the journal I think it will land in. This last particular part is key because if we’re there then it’s going to be fairly soon.” Iwasadiver

Wth? That’s a timeline.
icon url

sukus

03/15/22 9:21 PM

#451740 RE: iwasadiver #451634

#2.
icon url

reachjo

03/15/22 10:20 PM

#451750 RE: iwasadiver #451634

Outstanding post. Annals of Oncology has not updated to the April issue yet…???

…something is afoot.