It's an interesting question - supply CHS to others and let them build a battery, or keep it close and manufacture a superior silicon anode based on your patent. I have suggested a couple times on this board that a plan to push the sale of CHS seems to be missing. Perhaps the reason is that there is better potential in the sale of a superior battery than there is in just being a materials supplier? Time will tell, but if they've got the answer to cycling stability covered in the patent recently filed good times are ahead.
CHS still is needed for LED lighting, silicon quantum dots, chips etc. Best of both worlds...