it seems they are strictly reading what the claim states and not the specification and the dependency on claim 1
Judge Hughes stated he believes there is a valid patent based on the history and press but can he persuade the other 2 is the question
The overarching issue is that non of Judge Casper’s ruling should stand as she relied on the IPR rulings prior to remand and as Chief Judge Moore stated” the IPR has no bearing here”
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
