InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 526
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/04/2013

Re: Long term post# 43968

Tuesday, 03/08/2022 12:39:49 PM

Tuesday, March 08, 2022 12:39:49 PM

Post# of 46435
it seems they are strictly reading what the claim states and not the specification and the dependency on claim 1

Judge Hughes stated he believes there is a valid patent based on the history and press but can he persuade the other 2 is the question

The overarching issue is that non of Judge Casper’s ruling should stand as she relied on the IPR rulings prior to remand and as Chief Judge Moore stated” the IPR has no bearing here”