As you said you wanted to talk "different angles of view" ...
Maybe the author of "'Excludes WAMU with total assets of $299 billion and zero estimated losses to the DIF'" just wanted to point out, that the $ 299 billion of WAMU was not counted to the receivership assets statement, because it was the only receivership with no costs for the FDIC to solve it?
My next question would then be again, why was WAMU seized, if the buyer of WAMU could cover all the losses? Easy answer, when you get all the cash of WMBfsb for free...
Next question then after 10 years... for what recovery did we even settle such big case? Only that COOP shares? Hopefully not... would be the worst litigation result I ever saw... We gave up the 4 billion in of WAMU money residing at JPM and got... nothing?