InvestorsHub Logo

nsomniyak

02/28/22 1:46 PM

#14971 RE: rosemountbomber #14969

I don't doubt that the top 50 are owned by BP. However, I would ask how many of them were developed in-house by BO and also whether any of those 50 were "company makers" that catapulted a previously small co into the BP ranks.

Whatever the provenance, I think it is obvious to say that "blockbuster drug" goes hand in hand with "BP".

zzaatt

03/01/22 1:36 PM

#14986 RE: rosemountbomber #14969

That is all you do is attack anyone who is either providing information or discussing events

No, not really!
The "facts" and "events" are tendentious. There are very few facts to discuss. What we have is guesses, hopes, lies, and the whole range of stuff that anonymous posters produce, for fun or profit.

The ultimate fact is the usefulness of Lupkynis, and the continued increase in scripts. "Facts" like:

to achieve the sales level that you are talking about would be calculated in multiples of years if not decades.

are NOT facts, they's opinions, and opinions are products with value ranging from zero to .....

Mostly zero!

The numbers at this point are not bad, and the possibility of an impressive increase in the next quarter, followed by a BO is much more likely than your "fact" that "it will take decades (LOL!!!) to get to ...."

You have NO facts!