Replies to post #69368 on Aurora Cannabis Inc (ACB)

[player1234]

I'm wondering how that strategy is working out?

When the numbers said that EBITDA positive wouldn't happen you said, "But cam said so" and "the midas letter said so." The numbers were right.

Then you said, "but cam really meant the next quarter." (The beginning of the perennial next quarter timeframe.) The numbers were right.

When the numbers said that the new EBITDA positive goal wouldn't happen you said, "But Singer said so." The numbers were right.

When the numbers showed the company was bleeding cash and new ATMs were announced you said, "they'll only use it if they have to, and they don't have to." The numbers were right.

Now you want to imply that somehow, more dilution is something other than what it is. Given the record of the numbers showing the real story and your constant support of "inaccurate" management statements I wonder how that will work out? During that time management has continued to collect huge bonuses but shareholders have lost 98% of their money.

Yup, next quarter, next year.

The numbers tell the real story.