InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

vein

02/18/22 9:52 AM

#93892 RE: pitcook #93891

I hear u pit. Veining is good
icon url

frobinso

02/18/22 9:55 AM

#93893 RE: pitcook #93891

'I understand what an NDA is, but these other companies have them too. It seems like we have some high security material that the Defense Department needs for the safety of the Western World, and can never be discussed.'

Careful Pitcook, I's such a conspiracy guy and your will send me off the rails...LOL

I view the NDAs as a framework for piloting, and upon success a contractual deal is the outcome of collaberation under the NDA framework.

This keeps everyone in the right side of regulatory disclosures. I also feel we are closer then ever before. Do you want to be in our out when the news hits? That Close I hope.
icon url

Richard_LaRiv

02/18/22 10:21 AM

#93897 RE: pitcook #93891

How many people heard even a whisper of Intel’s intention to spend $6 Billion on a company named Tower Semiconductor? Nobody here did. The news is not released until a deal is signed.
icon url

Nrdc92

02/18/22 11:19 AM

#93901 RE: pitcook #93891

I’ve been writing this for years. I cannot understand why, when what we have seems to be so needed and revolutionary, that there is not so much as a whisper beyond this board’s rampant speculation. Sure, maybe, I hope, we’re just crossing our Ts before the big reveal, but, as I’ve written before, I feel like we’re living in our own Waiting for Godot science drama. Every year it’s “this is the year….” We’ve been under NDAs, it seems, since the Eisenhower administration and not so much as $20 of revenue. I’ve been stuck in this stock for so long that there’s no going back; but if I see one more nonsense MZ announcement of another nonsense investor conference I’ll lose it!! Sign a damn deal already!