Replies to post #221017 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Eagle1947]

No opinons here ... and certainly no illusion of having done as much work at unravelling the truth to the LQMT saga. However, it is odd that it has to be pointed out that the LQMT - USA version show anemic revenue, share trading and share price data. That is proven and is unquestionable.

Having that at ones fingertips, and, adopting a well thought out but unproven theory, makes a person wonder the wisdom and/or motives of the author. If the 4th quarter data remains unchanged and the promised March 22nd informantion is just more of the same will the opinions change ?

Can agreement over this issue be resolved after 20 years in March, 2022 ? I for one, will dismiss my skepticism if something of significance is revealed. That means the revelation of revenue will be documented, profit will be visable and the share price goes up to a level of at least $.60c.

Can anyone on the other side of the issue make similar declaritive expectations that support a continued allegiance to this company that has been in a perpetual rut ?

[Researchfyi]

Obviously it’s not proof of any amorphous metal CE parts sales. That’s not what an 8K sales agreement would look like in any shape or form. It’s an iteration of a partnership from a manufacturer to supply parts for LQMT’s existing orders that were established three years ago and any new orders or new contracts should LQMT ever ink a deal. It’s not proof of any deal. Or any new deal. That occurs when LQMT releases a PR. Not when speculations are detailed in such a fashion to stretch a theory into reality that does not exist.