"all they failed was the primary objective and that failure,IMO, was due more to the weak dosage allowed"
You don't know what the dosages were so you must have backed into that conclusion. Instead of a weak dosage leading to the failure, you concluded that because there was a failure there must have been a weak dosage.
"IMO" in the absence of facts is just idle speculation.
"We will see who is right when the complete trial data is released." Let's talk about this again if/when that happens.
The problem is things are going just fine for those at the top. They're also not subject to your opinion. Your purpose here is to pay their salaries while they gamble on dumpster drugs. If the gamble pays off then great for everyone. If not, the top still gets quite a bit more than they would working at H&R Block which is more their speed. Leo doesn't seem terribly concerned with collateral damage to degenerate gamblers like you and me aka IPIX shareholders.
Pete I provided all the info needed to google the story finding that 95% of over 2000 covid trials conducted world wide were under powered/under dosed.
No one one this board can convince me that what Ipix's trial, wasn't designed for failure and if Leo had control of his trial protocol then so would 1500 other participants who also screwed up their trial design that failed!!
As most of us have learned during the past year, Congress, the financial markets, the FDA and Powell and the FED are more corrupt than any of us would have ever believed. Really sad!!