Do companies typically provide 3rd party independent peer reviewed test results for a flagship over the counter dietary supplement that mostly hasn't even launched yet? :P It'd be nice if they did, but this isn't a FDA/EMA thing or clinical trials either.
Back to my point about people in a debate just shooting down the links and running with their premise anyway. :P If you want to consider this a red flag, be my guest, but I'd like to see a link showing what's scientifically inaccurate about those reports instead of rumors and hearsay trying to discredit the source.
The fact that we have reports at all (and a patent) is a green flag, unless they're all bogus. (prove it)