InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Glopez

02/08/22 12:53 PM

#105522 RE: Oclooper12 #105520

You’re right, 500+ to 1 is more likely.

200 to 1 is very optimistic and definitely not set in stone. With horrible, failed management who have no business sense and a total disregard for shareholders, 200 to 1 seems more like a pipe dream than reality.
icon url

Really People

02/08/22 1:25 PM

#105530 RE: Oclooper12 #105520

Exactly, Didn't age well at all. More to Come
icon url

FeMike

02/08/22 3:15 PM

#105563 RE: Oclooper12 #105520

I KNOW WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT!
Still waiting for you to tell me that the proposed 200:1 reverse split is a definite and the ratio cannot change? Waiting...




Ahem…