InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LexTrader

02/02/22 11:12 AM

#124251 RE: darron427 #124248

I don't disagree with this statement.
icon url

back2basics

02/02/22 4:49 PM

#124346 RE: darron427 #124248

darron. I'll probably regret exchanging with you because you are a much more proficient typer. But here goes:

What are " actual Mexicans"? You say they "are much lighter skinned" I've spent a lot of time in Mexico, from the Border to about 100 mi N of Mexico City. I've spent no time among the elite.

My observation is that most Mexicans are dark skinned. Maybe they aren't "actual Mexicans". I don't think this has anything to do with Globalists>

I think it has everything to do with the fact the invading Spaniards were far outnumbered by the native population.

Of course they speak Spanish. The schools, churches, Governments were all based in Spanish. No Globalists necessary.

Brazilians speak Portuguese for the same reason. Do you think Globalist decided to have Brazilians speak Portuguese, while surrounded by Spanish speaking Countries?

I was raised in Venezuela and have worked in Ecuador, Bolivia , Chile and Argentina. In Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia, the populations are largely dark skinned. In Chile and Argentina, not so much. Huge numbers of Europeans migrated to those Countries, after WW I. I t changed the gene pool.

I don' think Globalists played a part it that either.

I lived for 5 years on the Persian Gulf, in Arb Countries. I didn't see all those light skinned Arabs..

Iranians are more light skinned. It's a Farsi thing. Not a Globalist thing.

IMO.

B2B