InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

01/31/22 9:30 PM

#107992 RE: keepemcloser #107990

I don't know it for fact but I agree that NSA already had it anyway... I mean after all, we're talking "NSA".. They are supposed to be on top of it.. They have, I'm guessing, all the money available that is needed for such a situation, GOVT MONEY! OUR MONEY! UNLIMITED MONEY, right? And then when you add the fact that (afaik) they never paid anybody for LI to this day but at the same time, the authorities HAVE TO have it in order to deal with terrorism, ESPECIALLY since 9/11. And so I think that when NSA said that (about paying big money for LI) it was prolly just A BIG LIE to make the general public think there was no such thing. I don't know but thats how it seems...

Now, who is "Konstantinos"? I don't know that name.. I recall that vplm had some kind of deal going with Tata & it developed into problems & I don't remember the outcome. So many times, with them & other "partners", there was talk of & threats of lawsuits but I don't recall any trials?

You say RK intro'd Emu & Konstantinos to Tata. At what point in time, would you say that emu had amassed enough vplm shares to be running the show behind the scenes?

Why did you say that the testing of LI was "obviously successful"? Based on what? And what "payment" are you referring to that vplm was never paid? Tata used it when, how, where?

Of course there as "no integration" into vplm because that's what I've been saying for years is that vplm promised to but never integrated ANY of the tech into their Voip platform. I think they were just renting the platform anyway, no?

So what happened to the $2mm demand from Emu? Court? Trial? Seems like vplm failed at EVERYTHING they got involved in which is why I think it was ALL A FRONT TO BEGIN WITH & ALL THEY WERE REALLY INTERESTED IN WAS SELLING FIAT SHARES, period.