InvestorsHub Logo

Nick119

01/23/22 5:15 PM

#437986 RE: exwannabe #437972

That we can't say. We can speculate that there may have been further dialogue between Stupp and NWBO that clearly has swayed his opinion.

What's clear is that he is supporting/advising NWBO now. And that is the most important aspect of this revelation.

You can't twist, detract, or distract from this one Ex.

Poor Man -

01/23/22 6:26 PM

#437993 RE: exwannabe #437972

First, the Tampa Bay - LA Rams game way just crazy. If Tom Brady wins another Super Bowl, I was leaving the country, maybe taking up residence in Hyde Park.

Stupp’s involvement is obviously positive, but it’s a matter of degree depending on the scope of his responsibilities. If he’s taken on the role as an advocate with the FDA, that would be a very meaningful contribution. Just really depends.

The entropic interpretation is a bit pretentious.

biosectinvestor

01/24/22 2:00 AM

#438024 RE: exwannabe #437972

The disclosures are likely the last thing that is finalized in a paper like that and via disclosure forms. You'd want the disclosures to be up to date. So no, more likely whenever it was actually finalized in printable form.

AF is blowing smoke though. It clearly was not 2018. Also, I think I saw in a link that someone provided earlier in the day that 1) the first reference in 2019, it describes the relationship as Ad Hoc, but later, he adds it to his page in a less delimited manner, so the relationship could have been stepped up by 2020, when they added it to his page; and 2) I believe someone also posted an earlier paper in the middle of 2019 where he did not list NWBO at all.