Replies to post #366591 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Number sleven]

Dancing, Do you actually think an insurance company is going to be viewed as the good guys?
Sleven,

[dogn]

Quote:
A jury ruled in GSK’s favor over Teva


apologies, but i am unsure whether you are agreeing/disagreeing with my admitted oversimplification:


a jury trial...

dear jurists,
if you as a consumer of a product were given the option to (co)pay less for equivalent products, would you chose the greater or lesser cost product?

by show of hands, the greater cost product anyone? anyone?

Dancing, my take on your post was a misinterpretation that you viewed a jury would naturally be biased against Amarin and in favor of the generics in reaching their verdict. You later clarified your intent was to show it would be easy for plaintiffs attorneys to demonstrate that ordinary citizens are easily induced to infringe a patent by offers of lower pricing.

I disagree with the misinterpreted view, but agree with your clarified point:

no, i don't think so.
i am saying, it appears on the surface to be simple to get a jury to agree that lesser cost to a consumer is an inducement to select one product over another.