InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Researchfyi

01/11/22 9:19 AM

#219899 RE: jaybiscuit #219897

Let’s see if there is any real correlation between that data and LQMT or just another anomaly. So if there is any correlation between LQMT and it’s foreign market counterparts, it should be reflected in the volume of shares traded. Meaning one would expect LQMT’s volume to be over 14 million shares traded Or at least 18 times it’s average volume. About 3% of the LQMT float.

Historically from actual DD LQMT always traded 0.04 to 0.05 cents above it’s foreign market counterparts during a rally here on the otc.bb.

In the case of a stock with no contract announcements and almost zero increase in outsider’s interest. Volume becomes the factor between another wash rinse and repeat cycle and the real deal. So far and until revenues increase or a contract is announced to potentially increase revenues, these pops in the share price have been wash rinse and repeat cycles and sometimes with long spin cycles in between them.

Unfortunately for all shareholders looking forward, the only verifiable data going forward are the historical facts. Since LQMT offers no guidance on revenues or contracts or progress daily, weekly or monthly before 10Q’s are stated.

Unfortunately again, all of the hypothetical theories about potential for LQMT’s use in any shape or form too, has not had an impact to rally the volume or share price.

LQMT has the cash, the process, the IP, the trademark recognition, the capacity via partnerships to manufacture high volume parts, license fee agreements, cross sales agreements, but still had not come up with a new marketing sales strategy to take advantage of these facts and bring any of the hypotheticals to fruition.

Thus all shareholders have been left with going forward is the historical data and the over twenty years of endless forward worded meaningless LQMT executive rhetoric and hypotheticals extrapolated from global amorphous metal growth. In essence, it’s always everyone else that is doing just fine from amorphous metal sales. Just not LQMT.

No matter what anyone believes the revenues have not increased, the volumes are anemically low and the share price reflects what outside interest really thinks about LQMT’s potential for the future.

All are still waiting for the contracts. If everything is in place for contracts to happen another theory is not going to help nor make any difference. But they are (all of the posted research) down right interesting, while waiting for something big to happen.