InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,702.72
(
-0.29%
)

Replies to post #365842 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

Replies to #365842 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)
icon url

CaptBeer

01/08/22 7:15 PM

#365846 RE: Number sleven #365842

This was the logic used in the GSK v. TEVA case in which GSK claimed that treating for the post-MI LVD indication fell within the definition of the CHF indication which was being infringed.
icon url

marjac

01/08/22 8:25 PM

#365855 RE: Number sleven #365842

Yes, that certainly seems possible. Let's see if it is made in the upcoming Motion to Amend the Complaint.