InvestorsHub Logo

TenKay

01/07/22 12:13 PM

#106334 RE: octodb #106333

These comparisons of outstanding share counts are hilarious. The OS, in a vacuum, is meaningless. What does matter is the share count relative to various financial metrics that give some sense of what a “per share” value is for it.

A company that has an OS of 16 Billion shares when its revenues are over $350 BILLION per year and is highly profitable has an SIGNIFICANTLY more healthy share structure than a company with an OS of 1 Billion shares and revenues of maybe $5 million per year…and losing multiples of that in the process.

And that is not even accounting for the non-trading equity of another 5 BILLION shares sitting in the wings for the latter.

HMBL’s share structure is ridiculous for the scale of its business…and it is only getting worse.

0whammies

01/07/22 12:44 PM

#106336 RE: octodb #106333

But hasn't got 1/16th the long-term value in any sense. So, this is tremendously overvalued....I suppose that's what you're saying....it makes a lot of sense.

Warning: George Shark in the water!

ZigZag1

01/07/22 1:01 PM

#106338 RE: octodb #106333

Yes, Apple is the perfect company to compare HMBL to.

al19

01/08/22 7:33 PM

#106356 RE: octodb #106333

Correct and folks say it doesn’t matter… it’s funny plenty of room here once HMBL goes Global