InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Number sleven

01/05/22 11:16 AM

#365459 RE: ralphey #365457

Ralphey, I will give you the best summary I can. Hikma requested a dismissal with prejudice. Judge Andrews granted a dismissal without prejudice. This means that Amarin can amend the original complaint or bring a new infringment Suit in the future. The judge left the door open. For health net the combination of the PA, and covering gv at a lower tier, was enough for our claims to be plausible. I expect Amarin will file an amended claim within a month. I have asked Marjac if he thinks there might be something in the GSK v Teva ruling that might help.
Sleven,
icon url

Nukemtiltheyglow

01/05/22 11:28 AM

#365461 RE: ralphey #365457

Ralphey; I tend to agree with you. I'd like to hang Hikma and Dr. Reddy's by their toe nails. They started all this, they're the ones who lied during the Dusaster decision.

Marjac & Friends to right this wrong. If truth doesn't prevail then heaven help us.