InvestorsHub Logo

Number sleven

01/04/22 10:52 AM

#365250 RE: Abe1234 #365244

Abe, What are the details of the settlement that the generic companies offered to Amarin?
Thanks.
Sleven,

concapk

01/04/22 11:14 AM

#365259 RE: Abe1234 #365244

Abe1234,

It is always easy to post negativity from a "hind sight" perspective....
No one and I mean no shareholder would believe surrendering 50% of your company to a settlement with Generics.... Another individual with "hind sight" .....

ilovetech

01/04/22 11:15 AM

#365260 RE: Abe1234 #365244

Abe1234, Prior to Du, I was naive about the integrity level of the courts. As JL used to say, Amarin's invention was so clearly not obvious, that "a baby could see it." When everyone can see it but the Judge, we can conclude that the patents weren't lost, but rather stolen. Every single guardrail failed.

I would imagine Amarin's internal and external legal counsel would know their adverseries, including Judges to choose the more favorable jurisdiction. If they did, and I believe they should have, then they compounded the failure by raising the risk of defeat. But we lost on fraud, not on any conceivable merit.

As you probably know, Du recently ruled in short, immigration law is racist. Calls for her impeachment followed her ruling.

ILT

MateoPaisa

01/04/22 11:54 AM

#365275 RE: Abe1234 #365244

You don’t have the remotest clue of weather an agreement to settle was even an option during the case.