It’s possible that LWLG has a two-way NDA where they also do not wish to have disclosure of who and where until it’s time.
In that case ‘polymer’ may qualify as unacceptable terminology per the NDA.
Seems like the term ‘ubiquitous’ and mentions of polymer modulators would be going together, however, there may be reasons.
Remember, Lebby mentioned that they (LWLG) did not announce their application to NASDAQ list in the case that something might have derailed. He preferred to not announce rather than explain.
So, my take away is that Lebby is cautious and conservative with public information.