Re: ".20 bid"
The so called "offer" was not for the company or the patents, it was for Emu's shares. So I'm not sure what "bid" that equates to or not? In my opinion (and some others as well...) it was not a real offer at all. It was a ploy. Do you honestly think .20 could ever be accepted after all the years of this alleged fight for the promised 10's to 100's of billions of dollars? Of course not... In any event, it was a phony offer. As reported here several times, the Emu and/or Dr Gil were overheard (or leaked) making a deal (Emu hired him) to find a way to boost the price of vplm. They were overheard making this deal at least 2 mos before the announcement of the alleged "offer", or more. The conversation was reported here 2 mos before, but could've taken place even longer ago. I have posted a copy of the report made here, a couple of times after. The way I see it, after that "deal" was heard about to boost a sagging vplm, no way the subsequent "offer" for Emu's shares, could be seen a true offer. I see it as a ploy to boost the price (it failed..).
Some say Dr Gil or his "group" could not & would not risk being busted for making a phony offer. I say, they had nothing to worry about because no doubt Dr Gil had the money & it was known ahead of time & a forgone conclusion that the "offer" would not be accepted. So the ploy could never be proven. I think they were friends & maybe Dr Gil owed a favor or something along those lines. It certainly would not be the 1st time that vplm has used questionable and/or downright lying tactics in attempt to sell shares, boost the pps & garner new shareholders. If you don't know that to be absolute fact, you don't know vplm. Vplm has a clear track record of lying to shareholders in the I terest of perpetuating the fiat share printing/selling machine that vplm has been from day one.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
