Replies to post #362533 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Number sleven]

ggwpq, Thanks. Blurry eyes at this time of the day. I will read that tomorrow. Thanks for posting the document.
Sleven,

[north40000]

Correct, ggwpq-- I was( too obliquely) referring to what I had earlier posted on the CORT board:

"The Fed. Cir. affirmed the decision of the PTAB that Teva’s evidence did not establish, prima facie, that the claims of the Corcept patent recited subject matter that would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. 12/7/2021."

Readers here should be familiar with the opinion of the CAFC that you have provided with your link, as well as post 362536 for happenings in the GSK v. Teva case. Both are favorable to Amarin, IMO.