You say > "The only justification for not relaying this sooner would be to maintain the share price at around a dime where it’s been for the last two years while they negotiate the terms of a potential closure and sale of any assets including mutually shared IP."
Please explain how stringing this out provides any benefit ??? ... especially when the liability & downside of that scenario is weighed. Considering the circumstances, their Know-how, relationships and the acceleration of this new mega industry ... the chances of announcing some type of shut-down such as this seems as likely as them being bought out for $100 per share. Just saying.... there is zero logic to that scenario .... And with such a huge industry as this, there are hundreds of niches that can develop fairly quickly and therefore to make Shareholders really happy all LQMT would need is a few of those niches to do really well. So you don't trust Tony / the situation and you have still remained invested in the stock ????