Replies to post #219037 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Boilingman]

Please explain how this "worst case" scenario meshes with Chung's, Bromage's, and the other fellows accelerated stock options as well as the "carrot-on-the-stick" additional options if Chung gets and keeps the share price above 1 dollar a year or two out?

These scenarios are preposterous in the face of the public information that has been put out there
about executive compensation forthcoming if certain targets are met.

Why go through the ruse of all this if the end game was to really just belly-up the company come March?
And how could that happen anyway...they have money in the bank, debt securities etc etc.

What is going on here I believe is "poop" and "scoop" manipulation.....whomever is manipulating the PPS slowly downward is accumulating shares.

[connectingdots]

You say > "The only justification for not relaying this sooner would be to maintain the share price at around a dime where it’s been for the last two years while they negotiate the terms of a potential closure and sale of any assets including mutually shared IP."

Please explain how stringing this out provides any benefit ??? ... especially when the liability & downside of that scenario is weighed. Considering the circumstances, their Know-how, relationships and the acceleration of this new mega industry ... the chances of announcing some type of shut-down such as this seems as likely as them being bought out for $100 per share. Just saying.... there is zero logic to that scenario .... And with such a huge industry as this, there are hundreds of niches that can develop fairly quickly and therefore to make Shareholders really happy all LQMT would need is a few of those niches to do really well. So you don't trust Tony / the situation and you have still remained invested in the stock ????