InvestorsHub Logo

backtoreality

12/03/21 12:50 PM

#385659 RE: backtoreality #385658

Lack of funds? Didn't the FDA have their input on the design of the trial? That would explain a lot.

sunspotter

12/03/21 2:06 PM

#385663 RE: backtoreality #385658

“So then why was it intentionally underpowered to fail, for what benefit? Beneficial for who?”

To leave enough swill in the trough for Leo to swill, of course. We’ve already heard from loanranger how Leo has been pulling not just his outrageously high salary but back pay too.

You can’t pay for a proper clinical study and pull down a few million for yourself at the same time.

So instead run an underpowered study extremely slowly while paying yourself and tipping your toxic finance buddies the wink about the trial failure (wonder if Leo got a backhander for that?) so they can cash in their cheap shares before the inevitable crash.

As for the FDA, they give advice about studies, but the sponsors don’t have to take that advice.

I’ll bet a cent to a dollar they told Leo that the study needed to be bigger but he ignored that advice.