Replies to post #361683 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[caddiedad]

Appreciate the reply.

[ziploc_1]

Hickma figured they were accomplishing two things by their not responding to the EPADI brief in the rule 60 case...
1. they did not address the substance of the EPADI brief, which would have put them at a disadvantage...since it would have been hard to dispute that there was a fraud/mistake of importance to Judge Du's decision, as a part of which, the cropped Kura table was copied verbatim.
2. In the event that the court allowed standing, Hickma pretty much guaranteed that the court would allow them the opportunity to state their case in an oral argument....and not just decide the case on the briefs, which they suspected would go against them.