InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bright Boy

11/19/21 11:29 AM

#419302 RE: Hutaaga #419292

Thank you for that information. Your conversation mirrors everything that I know is happening with the company's managing strategies. To add one further point, DI told me that the SP has absolutely nothing to do with the value of the company.

Also, remember that the total volume traded today represents 3/100ths of 1% of the issued and outstanding!!!! No one has lost a penny until they sell !!!

Hang in there!!! The MM's are not rocket scientists and for the most part haven't a clue as to what Northwest is all about!!! We have a great product and management will get it to market, probably first in the UK!!! then other jurisdictions !!!

Cheers,

BB
icon url

sukus

11/19/21 11:33 AM

#419307 RE: Hutaaga #419292

Thanks Hutaaga!
icon url

Bob_LobLaw

11/19/21 11:42 AM

#419317 RE: Hutaaga #419292

Something does not add up. They did not think it would take 13 total months to release TLD and get a publication out when they sent out that the March 16th PR. 9 months does not qualify as "In coming months". They have no credibility
icon url

flipper44

11/19/21 11:57 AM

#419331 RE: Hutaaga #419292

With all due respect, your last paragraph (last eight words) is bunk. I assume you added that tag at the very end, because this is not what Dave is saying to people.
icon url

danielboog2

11/19/21 12:10 PM

#419354 RE: Hutaaga #419292

so add a few months delays to that



Thank you Hutaaga. The enormity of the whole process has overwhelmed NWBO. Seems some lose the perspective.

Maybe late Spring or summer! So patience.

GL2 All
icon url

exwannabe

11/19/21 12:23 PM

#419380 RE: Hutaaga #419292

Thought I would share this with you. Talked to Dave and spent good 25 mins this morning.


Always good for a laugh.

The summary is, it is now really is depend on the journal publication. If they release something early, it may jeoperdize the publication.


Yet, oddly every other public company with material results PR's TLD and still published a paper months later. Did you ask him why everybody else can do this but poor old NWBO can not?

The holding is mostly due to these peer reviews were having hard times getting information because lots of the sources were shutdown due to covid.


How pathetic. Nothing is shut down and electronic reviews such as this are the type stuff that is often going faster in the new world.

He said they are working hard to stay on top of everything and trying to get it right, but can only do so much on their part.


It is NEVER the fault of NWBO.

He did mention that the average time from DL to publication is 13 months, so add a few months delays to that.


is he really that ignorant of the companies industry that he does not know that data lock and data complete are very different?

Regardless, those numbers include trials that are not run by companies. When companies have significant positive results then they have huge stake in the getting the news out faster. It is non-profits that can be slow.

BTW, "reviews"? Are they shopping the paper to find somebody who is not laughing?
icon url

hoffmann6383

11/19/21 2:27 PM

#419504 RE: Hutaaga #419292

When you say they are awaiting on peer reviews does this mean we are at this final step of the process:

The process includes review and analysis of the raw data by independent statisticians and experts, and preparation of summaries of the Trial results for review by the Company, the Principal Investigator, the Steering Committee of the Trial, the Scientific Advisory Board, and a panel of independent brain cancer experts in preparation for public announcement and scientific publication.

In other words, the report is done, awaiting reviews?