InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BWIS

11/07/21 12:37 PM

#415601 RE: trocprofit #415600

Pssst. “The medical journal is taking too long”.

icon url

Hopeforthefuture3

11/07/21 1:02 PM

#415607 RE: trocprofit #415600

Trocprofit, jmo but I don't think we see anything at SNO on dcvax. Lots of good research to be presented just not what we are waiting on.
Check out the post from biosect #415425 - seems a very plausible reason on the timing to me
icon url

HappyLibrarian

11/07/21 3:28 PM

#415619 RE: trocprofit #415600

After a certain point you have to be willing to walk away, especially if someone is being passive aggressive and not really interested in moving forward on a time table that works for shareholders. I think that if they did not have a date certain for publication after a year (this is more than fair of TLD is really so great and we’re really giving that journal a huge scoop) then moving forward to SNO is crucial because otherwise we would be at their mercy until ASCO. Now would be the time to jump ship.

Still, I expect NWBO to waste time and not to do the peer review with SNO. While Flipper has presented some tantalizing hints I seriously doubt those breadcrumbs mean anything.
icon url

foxhound02

11/07/21 10:44 PM

#415657 RE: trocprofit #415600

They said TLD and a journal article. The two could be separated, as they usually are, by many months. "And" is still valid.