Kiwi Also Amarin may have considered they would struggle with Rule 60- they were a party- they may have faced challenge over As to why they did not in the Du proceedings bring challenge -as to Heinke evidence (as Jarvis is now doing in Epadi case) -as to K table cropping (as Epadi now doing) - as to the statistical analysis of Mori (as Epadi now doing)
The problem would be nee Rule 60 for them - a party - would be challenged as second bite of cherry -you lost - so you are now trying new tack / trying to introduce new evidence to get result you want
And of course they would be self exposing their own failings in the Du case - opening up legal action against them ? Alm
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
