I think its just more manipulation....The article talked about the "new approach" SAVA was taking....And that was in JULY 2012!!!!!! Nothing was said (in the article) about the manipulated data on the results....It couldn't have...The article was in JULY 2012....SAVA results were August 2021...Even if the "2012" meant to say "2021"...why would they comment on data manipulation prior to published results...This stinks and may present a golden short opportunity...
Something really stinks here and they will most likely get away it with as a simple "Oops"!