Marjac First read Absolutely on point ... direct ...robust ..destructive of the defendants attempt to divert from the real issues
Smith and Intel ...brilliant analysis .... and exposed the defendants and their lawyers for what they are all puff and no substance - (and seemingly do not even read the case law to which they refer )
The glaring fact that the Defendants make no attempt to deny the Rule 60 as to its substance really exposed -
defendants can not “deny the undeniable “-That just says it all in four words
A masterpiece of which you can truly be proud ....simply incredible- few could ever aspire to such
We have only one problem .... we need to have three Federal Court Judges who will read this Appeal documentation and understand the case from a scientific and logical perspective - if so
Hi Marjac i would like to thank you from bottom of my heart. I don’t understand this court language and documentation but whatever you doing for us. And bringing the truth out , helping all of us. We all shall be very thankful to you for your help. Anil
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
