Spot on Researchfyi, your analysis of royalties was spot on. Actual reported royalties were zero percent. What a bummer for anyone trying to connect a theory based on sincere, but unverifiable data. A reason why I try not to dabble in the unknowns. It sets up a probability of false hope not in line with what LQMT in fact states.
Actual royalties historically are 5% to 10%. This 10Q 0%. It means a lot.
LQMT has had three years now to follow through now on anyone thinking amorphous metal parts sold by its conflicted executive in China to international whales, would have revenues trickling in, in the form of royalties.
So far it has not happened. Maybe next time or next year. A line heard too many times.
As always my opinions are worth less than the pps of LQMT and to add insult to injury I don’t know much either.
But what I do know is this...amorphous metal is on the cusp of earning millions worldwide. Hundreds of millions and LQMT is on that same cusp. Saying it, hoping it and expecting it won’t make it happen any faster. Waiting for it will.
In the meantime I’ll stick to the realities of the facts of what LQMT does and how they perform good or bad every day and throughout their history and what they mean. I’ll leave the theories and wishful thinking too anyone else.
Looks like LQMT retained it’s four customers so far this year. The 10K should give more clarity. TC is expected to hold a conference call within five to six weeks. That should be interesting. Let’s hope the questions are equally interesting as well and perhaps TC can regain integrity lost. All will know soon enough if TC is a puppet or a CEO. Communications from LQMT would be a step in the right direction and restore confidence imho.
Good luck to all in LQMT
Must be a coincidence, but even the LQMT commentary mirrors your opinions Researchfyi of your own post you responded to.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
