InvestorsHub Logo

Dan88

11/01/21 8:53 AM

#414003 RE: antihama #413997

antihama, I know it's maybe far fetched but judged by how much time the company has been working on the TLD or publication, and the very peculiar or unprecedented nature of the DCVax-L trial history particularly pertain to the much-remain-secret historical interaction of the company with RAs, especially FDA, then I would think anything is possible. Perhaps the company's repeated overpromises and underdelivers is a prelude to a surprised RA approval.

Have the company already submitted BLA? I doubt it if a full formal BLA has been submitted, but think it's probable for a informal or substantially partial BLA which has submitted on a rolling base.

Definitely if I was running the company, for more than one full year having passed since datalock, plus more than 10 full years of the trial, I would definitely have prepared many mega-city telephone book thick documents which would be incorporated to formal BLA.

anyhow this is just speculation in the meantime, nothing more important to get announcement of TLD in whatever form so we can all analyze it

GL

Lykiri

11/01/21 9:03 AM

#414005 RE: antihama #413997

antihama,

I will respond to your post and the original post of Dan88 (https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166566358 - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166577282 ) and the reply of Exwannabe (https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166577616) with a new additional post later. I got information from MHRA inspectors (written correspondence) about the whole process.I think it is useful information for all members. I expect some additional information from the MHRA inspectors in the next couple of hours or days, so please give me some time to respond.