InvestorsHub Logo

Researchfyi

10/30/21 5:05 PM

#218243 RE: jaybiscuit #218211

That’s my estimate. The only link to that estimate is based on LQMT’s own data, coupled with their failure to communicate any progress with any existing or any new potential customer or customers. Meaning do not expect surprises to the upside. The 8K would have had to be in place or a request for a 10Q filing extension.

The estimate is not based on any unknown or theoretical expectations. Otherwise the sky would be the limit. So far LQMT has never ever participated into any of the theoretical sky is the limit theorists. Although they do on occasion express endeavors into the areas of industries earning billions.

That said. LQMT may have invested in expanding manufacturing domestically or abroad with another partner. I’m hoping here domestically with a whale of a contract which may take longer to mature based on LQMT’s data as already filed. Once again and not on any theoretical expectations.

Not saying theoretical expectations are not important. However, they no longer play a role in affecting the SP as they once did. Both hype, so called pumping or dumping do not sway the pps or entice new outsiders to jump in. The actual daily shares trading and share price back this up. The long term share price trends over the past five years are reflections of LQMT’s actual performance vs actual expectations. As anyone can see in the share price, actual performance always wins out and not expectations for quite some time.

To further make this point clear. You see all over the www how amorphous metal companies one way or another are making parts selling parts and how new products might use amorphous metal. One would think, myself included, that this data verified or unverified would increase outside interest from new dice rollers or serious investors looking at the potential to grow LQMT revenues. But as you, i or anyone else can see, it has not. The daily trading volumes separate from the share price are extremely low.

Does this mean all should not look for new sources of potential for success at LQMT? Absolutely not! It means that there is a huge difference between expectations and results and how everyone views expectations and actual data.

After 20 years with this dice roll, although I have an open mind to all views, only contracts are what matters now. The days of expectations have long gone.

Years ago expectations played a more meaningful role. Today it’s time for the executives at LQMT, to either sheeet or get off the pot. IMO, that’s where the focus should be on. From what I read all across the www, it’s not. Each time LQMT fails to meet expectations, the runway by those with expectations and theories gets extended in the same way LQMT extends their own runway for their own failures.

So we have a history of 20 years of expectations and a history of actual results. The expectations chart are always climbing, the actual results headed in the opposite direction. So what’s left? That’s easy. You now have a growing percentage of outsiders who have become much sharper no longer inclined to expectations but on actual performance. No longer interested in the forward worded commentary, but on the bottom line of continuous growth of not one or two quarters, but years of quarters.

This is why imo, opinions clash to the point of where the opinions of others are read as personal attacks, when they are in fact not.

Good luck to you.