alm2, Thanks for your thorough answer here:
Question arise from the fact that eight several times has used the fact 'that Amarin did/do not embrace' the Marjac filing as the probarble argument FC will use to deny the case to court.
Given that' - every angle of this question ought/should be investigated - as to afterwards not 'again' all the endless IF's.
You explained what underneath 'Amarins position on this'.
Personally I don't see why KM - given he has no part in Amarin decisions before Nevada ruling, can not send out a Press release, where he out of simple logic - points Out that Amarin naturally' supports the Rule60 case - that in every way aims to restore the org. Amarins position - that all the Companies patents are liable and correct as they were approved.
Jasbg
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
