Replies to post #357739 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[ziploc_1]

Marjac...In the rule 60 case, the facts are with us...i.e. the Kura table was cropped and the table was cited verbatim as a reason for the judge's decision.

In the negligence case, I do believe the Amarin legal team and perhaps management were negligent...but IMO, it is not as clear as in the rule 60 case...Lets win the rule 60 case and not bother with the negligence case.

[marjac]

jas,

Any future lawsuit recovery comes from insurance.

My focus is exclusively on the Rule 60 Reply Brief.

I commented on the other stuff, because the topic arose, and I feel it is important to dispatch with the concept that such cases are devoid of merit.

You have the best of weekends as well. I will be taking advantage of the quiet time to advance the Rule 60 Reply Brief.

[Bouf]

If this investment now depends on a recovery from insurance companies for the board and company lawyers, via derivative lawsuits over whether people made reasonable business judgments in the past, it is truly time to get out.

Pissing in the wind.

Beware of lawyers trolling for clients.

B