Ishouldknowbetter,
If I were to proceed, there would be lengthy litany of omissions of material fact, and I would probably have a liability expert pre-screen the case for merit. If I were to proceed, there will be extensive due diligence research, and pre-suit investigation.
Once again, merely saying the patents are at risk, is not necessarily legally sufficient to defeat a claim for fraud/negligent misrepresentation. Further, we do not necessarily know at this time, what discovery would reveal. Perhaps the duties owed by a company to its shareholders are a little more comprehensive than some realize.
Thank you for supporting us on the Rule 60.