BINGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
We will see who is right or wrong here, TIME WILL TELL and TIME TELLS ALL
Logic and common sense says, in the period of 13 yrs a company NSM doesn't grow from 16 bill to 650 bill AND RIGHT AT THE SAME time WMI had 635 bill in force at seizure according to the SEN sub comm (TOM COBURN)
636+16='s HMMMMMMMMMMM 652 BILLION
KOWINKIDINK OR NOT, all here need to decide on their own.
Like it or not one has to remember that THE FDICK needed as with all seized institution, NEEDED A SERVICER for THOSE LOANS, and what better way to make this RIGHT, than to make US all owner in the REAL REORG'D company.
But they have to pay us for what was taken at the time in real dollars.
THIS WAS A 5TH TAKING CASE so they have to pay..........
And to make sure we DIDN'T GET HOSED AGAIN, SUSSMAN made sure the most valuable thing here, COULD NOT BE TRADED, ESCROWS
Can anyone here show us WHERE NSM ever 8K's or PR'd WHAT THEY PAID for any of the loans to service????????????
Remember the 65 bill that showed up HERE right after the DB case was settled, was there any statement of WHAT NSM PAID for servicing rights on that 65 bill? no matter where it came form, NOPEY NONE CAN SHOW US
LOGIC and COMMON SENSE
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
