InvestorsHub Logo

postes

10/04/21 3:21 PM

#356228 RE: CaptBeer #356227

Capt. I am happy with the status quo…… I would like to give KM a year or 2 and see what happens….. he is doing everything realistically possible….. 2 years is not a long time and there is tons of good news coming in the coming months.

couldbebetter

10/04/21 3:57 PM

#356234 RE: CaptBeer #356227

CaptBeer, I wish Marjac would either go through the process to get
himself or someone he could vet that would be a shareholder activist.
Long overdue. Sadly, in the past whenever this was brought up the
idea never gained any traction.

Jasbg

10/04/21 4:29 PM

#356236 RE: CaptBeer #356227

Capt, It is a good idea - at least in theory.

I don't know how it will work in practice though. Not necessarily an easy position' - to be at meetings were you might be considered almost a spy/possible leak.

And then there are all the practicalities - who pay for expenses - travels etc.
--------------------

But if we consider carrying on the idea - and Amarin forehand accepts a possible Shareholder member on the board - that has to be the first thing that is addressed/investigated.

If company is upright against the idea - its not worth the effort of trying to force such an idea forward IMO.
--------------

I would say that you yourself - I would surely vote for - other level headed candidates here would be someone like Lizzy or Downtown. And there are many others here on this board - that could do the job professionally - if it came to be real - for sure.

marjac

10/04/21 5:36 PM

#356247 RE: CaptBeer #356227

Captain, I think louieblouie is in the best position to answer your inquiry.

alm2

10/05/21 4:46 AM

#356281 RE: CaptBeer #356227

Capt beer -Marjac

Not a question easy to answer but one Marjac may well have defined in the Rule 24 / 60 proceedings-we are a few weeks away from the generics reply brief and their case for the denial of the appeal being set out
The basis on Rule 24 is E has no standing ( behind which maybe who are E anyway)- a specifically defined group of shareholders who contributed to the fund to bring the proceedings might well be the definition
But Marjac will be best to speak of this
Alm

louieblouie

10/05/21 10:06 AM

#356306 RE: CaptBeer #356227

you mean this one?

http://epadruginitiative.com