Jack, I am not replying to rekindle this discussion but to clarify a misunderstanding you and others have of me. By asking Anders what he intends to do about his views, I am not disagreeing, questioning his motives nor being childish. I am telling him that continuing down the path would make me question motives though. I am being quite serious about that question.
Let me add details to my prior story which you found interesting…
Before getting the advice from my friendly corporate counsel, I asked him if I could get his legal opinion on a personal issue. He replied “That depends” I, of course followed with “That depends on what?”
His reply, “On whether your story is interesting. I am always interested in an interesting case, but my advice may be to get the right counsel.”
If you knew me personally, you would not be surprised at all by this next bit. I make it a point to get to know my legal advisors. Once I know them, I do have a test question that I ask.
But first, I start by telling them I once got some amazing personal legal advice from a corporate counsel colleague. Part 1 of test… Do they ask me about that story. If not, you are placed in one bucket. If so, I tell them the story but stop before I tell them the advice. They always ask, what was the advice and I always say “I will tell you, but first I am interested in what your advice would be?” ALWAYS
That is the real test because a true attorney ALWAYS takes up that challenge, and they stop and they think before answering…ALWAYS and the sample is quite large…ALWAYS.
Now you may understand me a little bit better…the true me, not MI Dendream nor WI Dendream.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
