InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pokestake

01/30/07 8:05 AM

#63044 RE: justfrank #63043

We are essentially in agreement. GTEM stated that none were reported, not that there could never be any. That is why it appears as two different statements to me. As you say, Dohan is saying we will not guarentee that there will be none, even though we had not found any. They are both being very careful not to step on the other's toes, but they are also covering their posteriors. Yes it is humorous.
icon url

siriuslyricher

01/30/07 10:09 AM

#63085 RE: justfrank #63043

You're right, Frank. It's a non-event. One of their lawyer's probably made them do it (and earned $300/hr drafting the language).
icon url

good2be

01/30/07 10:53 AM

#63106 RE: justfrank #63043

it's just legaleze, w/ all parties covering their respective bases..............and we won't know who the smart one is (was) until all the dust has settled................