And some wild price fluctuations in between which the SEC should investagate to find the links as to who made the big money. I think it will leave a trail to the people called when Huff resigned his post.
NOPE, that's definately "other words" that's unfortunately NOT what Huff said. He told the investors that he'd exercise the default if the money wasn't there by Friday and instead allowed a bogus scam deal to continue for another three months. His intent of the statement was an immediate default not an upcoming default more especially by virtue of his statements "..distracting..immediate opportunities" as well as him also stating in the pr that he would not allow it to drag out any further (summary). The warning of default was pending upon that Friday not some later time down the road when the stock went from 2.something at the time of the default threat to under a buck 3 months later at the time of the decided default and there's argument still on who really defaulted at that time.