Replies to post #39816 on FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL)

[stew1340]

Alot gotta start somewhere. This gives a fair account

https://theconversation.com/cant-we-just-remove-carbon-dioxide-from-the-air-to-fix-climate-change-not-yet-45621

[XenaLives]

I cut and pasted your question into Google...

Q: Is direct air capture a good option to rapidly decarbonize industry?

A: At this time, with the current status of DAC technology, it can help to compensate emissions from sectors that are hard to decarbonize. To meet global goals — removal of 1,000 gigatons CO2 by 2100 — using DAC alone, nearly 13,000 DAC plants with 1 metric ton CO2 per year capacity are needed today. We’d need a nearly $1.7 trillion capital investment globally. For that reason, other negative emission technologies need to be considered where they are more affordable and effective.

https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/can-we-remove-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere


Googling that 1.7 trillion it looks like the U.S. could afford it...

This Country Is Spending $1.7 Trillion on Planes That Don't Work

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a35631305/f-35-doesnt-work-1-7-trillion-dollars/

[OrizG]

I believe that's a VERY SMART and RESPONSIBLE question to ask.

Unfortunately, answers are not very clear or understandable in common English.
Results from Google will get you too many different angles that lead to debatable arguments that will end up to no conclusions anyways.

People still struggle to understand, fail or simply don't care while they're comfortably watching Netflix on their couches and driving their polluting, clean air burner vehicles.

The truth is that it's our lifestyle that is toxic to us and our planet.

We already have solutions, ingenuity, will and working technologies to stop this.
FCEL is certainly one of them

The reversal has already started around the planet, we just need time now.