InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 484
Posts 60922
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/20/2001

Re: $5.95akadawson-m post# 39816

Thursday, 09/09/2021 7:52:20 AM

Thursday, September 09, 2021 7:52:20 AM

Post# of 60486
I cut and pasted your question into Google...


Q: Is direct air capture a good option to rapidly decarbonize industry?

A: At this time, with the current status of DAC technology, it can help to compensate emissions from sectors that are hard to decarbonize. To meet global goals — removal of 1,000 gigatons CO2 by 2100 — using DAC alone, nearly 13,000 DAC plants with 1 metric ton CO2 per year capacity are needed today. We’d need a nearly $1.7 trillion capital investment globally. For that reason, other negative emission technologies need to be considered where they are more affordable and effective.



https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/can-we-remove-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere


Googling that 1.7 trillion it looks like the U.S. could afford it...

This Country Is Spending $1.7 Trillion on Planes That Don't Work



https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a35631305/f-35-doesnt-work-1-7-trillion-dollars/


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FCEL News