But the public "company" is Solei Systems, Inc., which may or may not be affiliated with the company you believe you see, and you don't know which it is in the absence of business disclosures. Additionally, there is no excuse whatsoever for the company's failure to file those disclosures.
Solei Systems, Inc., got cash from "friends" in exchange for discounted stock when the company was on the greys the first time. They gave the bulk of the cash to the owner of Careclix, a dying business with an owner who appeared to be cashing out. The company came off the greys with fanfare and a couple pumping PR's, and that discounted stock was sold into the market at a tidy profit. That action was textbook pump and dump.
Then a pandemic happened and telemedicine (and this company) got an unexpected catalyst. Next thing you see is the owner of Careclix being interviewed and making a statement that got them booted right back to the greys. That was, what, 18 months ago? That suspension is cause for the warranty on the purchase to be invoked and the transaction to be undone.
Somewhere along the way, the CEO of SOLI, who was the controlling shareholder, was awarded 60M shares of stock without the regulatory required filings documenting the how's, how much, why's, etc. There's a reason for that regulation, and they ignored it. Textbook scam.
There is nothing in a suspension that would cause or excuse a legitimate to not disclose its business performance to its shareholders.
Does all that (and more that I left out) mean it is absolute? Nope. But it sure looks and quacks like a duck. There's quite a distance between "people in an office" and even a government contract with Careclix's name on it to draw the line to the next dot that SOLI shareholders own it. SOLI, the public company, appears to be dead.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
